Table: Maneskin Current Member Status
| Name | Role | Solo Projects | Current Status in Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Damiano David | Lead Vocalist | Everywhere (solo album) | Still active |
| Victoria De Angelis | Bass Guitarist | GET UP B***!* ft. Anitta | Still active |
| Thomas Raggi | Guitarist | None announced | Fully committed |
| Ethan Torchio | Drummer | None announced | Fully committed |
The mysterious statement made by Damiano David, “Today is the first day of my life,” went viral on Instagram and sparked a flurry of fan theories regarding Maneskin’s future. Only a few months after the band’s successful international tour ended, his solo project Everywhere was released, and it had a deeply personal and emotional tone. Some fans read between the lines and interpreted this as his gentle farewell to Maneskin, while others applauded his vocal experimentation and personal lyrics.
Victoria De Angelis, meanwhile, launched her own musical side trip by working with Brazilian sensation Anitta on the upbeat single GET UP B**!. The song represented a significant stylistic departure from the band’s gritty rock origins because it was purposefully bold and club-focused. Her shift to dance-pop raised more questions: was this a warning sign or just an artistic experiment?
Even though these solo endeavors diverge greatly from the band’s common sound, Maneskin’s core has remained intact. Rather, they show a calculated, possibly even healthy, growth. Indeed, history has repeatedly demonstrated that well-known bands, from Destiny’s Child to The Rolling Stones, have survived comparable times without breaking up. Instead of weakening the group’s identity, their individual journeys strengthened it.
Diversification is frequently praised in the music industry today. Nowadays, artists are urged more and more to express themselves in a variety of media and genres. Damiano and Victoria’s decision to go out alone is part of a larger cultural movement that values diversity over restriction. Icons like Beyoncé and Harry Styles have significantly enhanced their craft through solo endeavors before rejoining their groups with renewed inventiveness.
There isn’t much room for doubt in the band’s own statements. In an interview earlier this year, Victoria made it very clear that “we’re not done.” All we’re doing is sleeping. That’s all. Her optimism was echoed by Damiano, who described his solo endeavor as a “creative necessity” as opposed to an exit tactic. They put on a united front with their assurances, which have been given repeatedly over the last few months. It seems that Maneskin is changing, not dying.
The public’s curiosity is understandable, though. It feels like a sudden change when a group that took the world by storm—dominating Eurovision, dominating international charts, and dazzling fashion campaigns—shifts gears. Fans, who frequently have strong emotional attachments, are left to fill in the details. Panic spreads quickly when rumors, rather than facts, fill in those gaps.
This uneasiness has been heightened by online forums. Anxiety has been exacerbated by speculative fan videos, Reddit threads, and TikTok theories. One particularly popular post suggested tension between members by analyzing body language during a recent appearance. Such interpretations, however, frequently overlook context, such as fatigue from touring or just negotiating the challenges of celebrity.
In the future, the group seems to be striking a balance between individual development and group unity. Insiders have hinted at a “hybrid album” that combines solo flavors with the band’s distinctive grit, raising expectations for a new group project in late 2025. Despite being unorthodox, this model has the potential to be especially creative since it lets each member express their uniqueness without sacrificing the group’s voice.
The long-term viability of bands is remarkably preserved by this kind of transition. It greatly lowers the chance of sudden or hostile breakups by allowing artists to breathe and experiment. They are directing their creative energy into side projects that eventually feed back into the collective rather than stifling it until it blows up.
Additionally, the change is a reflection of larger societal shifts. Today’s young fans value subtlety and recognize that romantic and creative relationships aren’t always black or white. It is not necessary to always be at each other’s sides to be “together.” Autonomy and collaboration are compatible. This attitude, which is very different from previous decades, has made it possible for fans to accept changes within bands as long as there is open communication.
Additionally, there is the business aspect to take into account. Maneskin, which is supported by international brands and signed to major labels, is still a profitable business. The band’s momentum would be undermined and their market influence and brand value would be diminished if they broke up now. Strategically speaking, it makes more sense to maintain the group’s unity while occasionally letting each member shine alone.
In the end, all of this conjecture leads to a narrative of transition rather than rupture. The Italian quartet, which started out as a teenage band playing the streets of Rome, is now surprisingly mature in its handling of the demands of international fame. Their relationship seems especially strong, even though the music may change.
Did Maneskin end things? The evidence clearly indicates that the answer is no. Driven by curiosity and ambition, they are navigating a time of introspection. However, the band is still together, and their willingness to encourage one another’s solo endeavors may have even strengthened it. For the time being, fans may not notice the chaos on stage or the stadium-sized hooks, but Maneskin’s story is far from finished.
